← European guide

Policy observatory · 27 EU member states

UAP policy in the EU: the regulatory matrix

There is no common EU framework for unidentified anomalous phenomena. This matrix compares how each of the 27 member states handles reports: official bodies, military involvement, public archives, political statements and civil society collection.

27 countries, 27 different answers

Only France operates a permanent, publicly accountable UAP office (GEIPAN, within the space agency CNES). A handful of states have declassified historical military files, and several parliaments have seen questions or statements in recent years. For most member states there is no public policy at all: reports, where they exist, are handled by volunteer organisations. An empty cell means no verified public information – not that nothing exists behind closed doors.

2023-11-09 · European Commission · answer E-9-2023-002375 (9 Nov 2023) ↗

The matrix: all 27 EU member states

Five comparable criteria per country. Values reflect verified public sources only; where no reliable public information exists, the cell is marked as not verified.

Official reporting bodyMilitary / defence handlingPublic archive or databaseRecent political statementCivil / volunteer collection
AustriaNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedPartialNot verified
BelgiumNot verifiedNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedYes
BulgariaNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
CroatiaNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedPartialNot verified
CyprusNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedPartialNot verified
CzechiaNoPartialNoYesNot verified
DenmarkNot verifiedPartialYesNot verifiedYes
EstoniaNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
FinlandNot verifiedNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedYes
FranceYesYesYesYesYes
GermanyNoPartialNoYesYes
GreeceNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
HungaryNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedPartialNot verified
IrelandNot verifiedNot verifiedPartialPartialNot verified
ItalyYesYesYesNot verifiedYes
LatviaNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
LithuaniaNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
LuxembourgNoNot verifiedNot verifiedYesNot verified
MaltaNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
NetherlandsNot verifiedNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedYes
PolandNot verifiedYesNot verifiedYesNot verified
PortugalNot verifiedNot verifiedPartialNot verifiedYes
RomaniaNoPartialNot verifiedPartialNot verified
SlovakiaNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
SloveniaNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedPartialNot verified
SpainNot verifiedPartialYesNot verifiedNot verified
SwedenNot verifiedPartialPartialNot verifiedYes

How to read the matrix

Yes = a verified public mandate, structure or release. Partial = limited, historical or indirect handling (for example a one-off declassification or routine air-surveillance responsibility). No = the state has publicly stated it has no dedicated arrangement. Not verified = no reliable public source found; this is an absence of evidence, not evidence of absence.

  • Yes
  • Partial
  • No
  • Not verified

What stands out

France: the EU's only standing office

GEIPAN, part of CNES, has collected, investigated and published UAP reports since 1977. Its case files and A–D classification system are public, making France the only member state with a permanent, transparent structure.

Germany: a parliamentary answer, no change

In October 2026 the federal government answered a Bundestag question (Drucksache 21/8662): no dedicated UAP responsibilities, reporting channels or databases exist, and Berlin sees no need to update its routines despite developments in the United States.

Spain and Portugal: military archives opened

Spain's air force declassified its UFO files in the 1990s, now accessible through the defence ministry's virtual library. Portugal's air force has released historical documentation to its archives. Neither country runs a standing reporting office today.

The rest: civil society fills the gap

In Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and elsewhere, volunteer organisations screen and archive reports. In many member states – particularly in Central and Eastern Europe – no verified public structure or statement could be found at all.

Sources

Sources checked 25 October 2026

Austria
Bundesheer / Austro Control air-surveillance exchange; commander interview Feb 2023 after balloon incidents.futurezone · interview with Air Forces commander (Feb 2023) ↗
Belgium
Belgisch UFO-meldpunt (civilian, 2007): public annual reports, 161 observations in 2024.Belgisch UFO-meldpunt · organisation ↗
Croatia
Government statement 11 Mar 2022 on the Zagreb unmanned-aircraft crash: conventional incident handling.Croatian government · Zagreb drone statement (Mar 2022) ↗
Cyprus
Government spokesman Mar 2026: suspicious-air-object incident investigated and closed; ordinary security response.
Czechia
MoD FOI answer MO 86405/2021 (25 Mar 2021): statutory airspace protection only; no UFO occurrence register.Ministerstvo obrany ČR · FOI answer MO 86405/2021 ↗
Denmark
Air Force UFO archive published 2009 (329 pages, 1978–2002); SUFOI civilian association since 1957.Forsvaret · Flyvevåbnets UFO-arkiv (published 2009) ↗SUFOI · about (Denmark) ↗
Finland
FUFORA / Suomen Ufotutkijat ry: civilian searchable case database; no government database verified.FUFORA · case database (Finland) ↗
France
GEIPAN (CNES) since 1977; Air & Space Force and gendarmerie are partners; public case database with A–D classification.CNES · GEIPAN mission and partners ↗GEIPAN · public case database ↗
Germany
BMVg answer, Drucksache 21/8662 (16 Oct 2026): no separate UAP reporting channels, structures or databases; no change planned.Deutscher Bundestag · Drucksache 21/8662 (16 Oct 2026) ↗
Hungary
Ministry response Jun 2023: Air Operations Command and Control Centre identifies flights and phenomena; no extraterrestrial indication found.Origo · ministry response on UFO files (Jun 2023) ↗
Ireland
FOI records (Jul 2023): a 2021 public enquiry passed between departments; responsibility unclear.Irish Times · FOI records on UFO correspondence (Jul 2023) ↗
Italy
Air Force designated 1978 to collect and verify reports; intake via Carabinieri; public sighting summaries by year (2019–2026).Aeronautica Militare · UFO/OVNI reporting ↗
Luxembourg
Ministers Bausch and Fayot (Sep 2021, parliamentary question): UAP observation is not a Luxembourg Space Agency task.Paperjam · parliamentary question coverage (Sep 2021) ↗
Netherlands
UFO Meldpunt Nederland (civilian, 2005): public database and annual statistics; no government mandate verified.UFO Meldpunt Nederland · about ↗
Poland
Defence answer to interpellation 5052 (7 Oct 2024): radar signals of 26 Aug 2024 analysed; protocol NATO CONFIDENTIAL.Sejm · answer to interpellation 5052 (7 Oct 2024) ↗
Portugal
Air Force Historical Archive exists; a UFO declassification is not verified. CIFA AERO24UAP: civilian aerodrome outreach 2024–25.Arquivo Histórico da Força Aérea (Portugal) ↗CIFA · AERO24UAP civilian initiative (Portugal) ↗
Romania
Defence Ministry spokeswoman (May 2008, historical): no specially resourced UFO research department.Ziare.com · Defence Ministry spokeswoman (May 2008) ↗
Slovenia
Officials (May 2008, historical): police check reports for possible offences; Foreign Ministry held no UFO information.24ur · officials on UFO reports (May 2008) ↗
Spain
Biblioteca Virtual de Defensa, Expedientes OVNI: 80 files, ~1,900 pages, 1962–1995; declassification review began 1991.Biblioteca Virtual de Defensa · Expedientes OVNI ↗
Sweden
AFU research archive holds copies of ~3,000 defence reports (FOI / Military Archives digitisation); UFO-Sverige collects reports.AFU · Archives for the Unexplained (Sweden) ↗

Method and limits

  • The matrix covers the 27 EU member states only. The United Kingdom, Norway and other European countries are outside its scope.
  • A criterion is marked Yes or Partial only when a dated, verifiable public source exists. Everything else is marked Not verified.
  • Military handling refers to a known defence-ministry role in receiving or assessing reports – not to routine air policing, which every state performs.
  • The matrix is a snapshot. Parliamentary questions, declassifications and new mandates can change a country's row at any time.

Explore further

FAQ

Does the EU have a common UAP policy?

No. There is no EU-level agency, regulation or reporting framework for UAP. The European Parliament hosted a public UAP session in March 2024, but no institutional follow-up has been adopted. Policy remains entirely national.

Which EU country has the most developed UAP policy?

France. GEIPAN, within the space agency CNES, is the EU's only permanent public office that receives, investigates and publishes UAP reports, with an open archive dating back to 1977.

Why are so many countries marked Not verified?

Because no reliable public source confirms any official arrangement. Most member states have never published a UAP policy, and absence of evidence is marked honestly rather than filled in with assumptions.